One person, one ID
In this personal note, the author discusses various topics related to identity verification and authentication. They mention several keywords and provide links to relevant tweets for further information.
The note starts by mentioning Idena and Bright ID, highlighting the network effect of BrightID. The author refers to a tweet by tkgshn on December 10, 2021, which provides more insights into BrightID's network effect . Next, the note mentions the DID Protocol and how it is being used as a Credit oracle. Instead of using iDaaS, the author mentions that Gitcoin is trying to achieve this at the service level. They refer to a tweet by WakiyamaP on January 2, 2022, which discusses the use of other DID systems in Gitcoin . The author understands that relying on Gitcoin for DID-related information makes sense due to the trustworthiness and difficulty of creating multiple accounts. The note also mentions the need for 複垢対策 (anti-multiple account measures) during Quadratic Funding. They mention the authentication of several iDaaS providers to increase the percentage https://gyazo.com/30f54b6ae7069b415f823b5730a0fd4e. The author predicts that there might be a Retrospective drop that treats Gitcoin coefficient as a pseudo-KYC measure for anti-multiple account measures this year. Lastly, the note briefly mentions a tweet by 0xmamedai on January 2, 2022, which discusses the method of Airdrop and how Gitcoin is trying to take on the role of a DID aggregator . The note also mentions Gitcoin authentication. Overall, the note covers various aspects of identity verification and authentication, highlighting the role of BrightID, the use of DID Protocol as a Credit oracle, Gitcoin's approach to aggregating DID information, and the need for anti-multiple account measures during Quadratic Funding.